Old media is still a powerful tool that influences millions of people every single day. Yet the media is far from objective in its coverage of political issues. Reporting is dead; but putting spin on information is alive and well (even if you’re in the “No-Spin Zone”).
With that in mind, let’s talk about this issue of “electability.” Why is it being repeated so much by the talking heads on TV?
The reason is simple:
They’re trying to convince you that it’s better to vote for a bad candidate who might be able to beat Obama than a good candidate whom the establishment would like you to believe doesn’t have a chance.
But this is the underlying message: There is a better candidate!
His name is Ron Paul.
And if people stopped believing the lie that they must vote “for the lesser of two evils,” then Ron Paul would beat Obama by a landslide.
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
[...] experts in the media repeat the belief that, “Ron Paul is not a viable candidate”, “Ron Paul is unelectable” or “Ron Paul has a ceiling on his support.” Surprising his media critics, he placed [...]
[...] course, fraud in Iowa and Nevada was no cause for alarm among the mainstream media because “Ron Paul is unelectable,” and who cares about voter fraud [...]